If you know me or have been reading this blog long you know I’m a firm believer in the idea of compelling content being the best way to use social media tools. That’s what the whole “Old McDonald” approach to good content is all about. If, however, it’s still not coming together for you, think about this: content MUST have value to the people you’re trying to reach. If it doesn’t, it’s not good content. It’s probably boring information that lacks something interesting or it’s marketing copy that’s just you talking about you.

So…let’s go back to the old McDonald idea. If good content that has value to someone contains at least one of the EIEIO elements (Entertain, Inspire, Educate, Inform, or Outrage) then you are creating content with value. If you’re still stuck though, add “me” to the end of the words. It would look like this:

• Entertain Me.
• Inspire Me.
• Educate Me.
• Inform Me.
• Outrage Me.

See what’s missing here? You. It’s not about you. It’s about me…the person you’re trying to reach. Now go write a blog post for the “me” you want to read your blog.

Last week I was in a meeting with people from a number of different organizations all discussing a common issue. I was the “social media” guy at the table with a few traditional marketers with various specialties along with non-marketing people working through an particular situation. During the course of the discussion I realized again how stark the difference is between the way I approach marketing and promotion compared to some more traditional marketers. I attribute this difference in thinking to people like Seth Godin, Chris Anderson, and Robert Scoble…all of whom have provided books and blog that have formed the way I approach the new technology for marketing purposes. I took some notes of my thoughts at the time and here’s what came out…

It’s not that television as we’ve known it doesn’t matter. It’s just that it doesn’t matter as much as it used to.

It’s not that newspapers as we’ve known them don’t matter. It’s just that they don’t matter as much as they used to.

It’s not that radio as we’ve known it doesn’t matter. It’s just that it doesn’t matter as much as it used to.

It’s not that marketing, advertising, public relations, and any other form of promotion as we’ve known it doesn’t matter. It’s just that it doesn’t matter as much as it used to.

It’s not that the way you’ve been marketing isn’t effective anymore. It’s just that it’s less effective today than it was yesterday and it will be increasingly less effective tomorrow, next week, and next year.

The lesson here isn’t that you have to make a total switch to social media marketing today. The lesson is that you need to be moving toward social media marketing and as you do, you can’t think about it the same way as the old way you did marketing.

I’m going to admit this up front: I have a few issues when it comes to advertising agencies and marketing firms. I don’t think they’re all bad, but I believe there are a lot of new options (which are better for the client) for people who need the same types of services that ad agencies and marketing firms offer.

For instance, you can find really good graphic design, web design, or web development services from a multitude of companies that have no more than two people in the company. More than likely, if you go with one of those you’ll pay about half of what the agency will charge you because you’re not covering a large overhead. I once worked for a company whose annual rent was more than what most of the people who worked there made in a year. It wasn’t that the work was that much better or that the technology was that much more expensive or that the staff was that much more talented. It was just that the company had a lot of overhead to cover and that was passed along to the clients. Again, not all the larger places are bad, but the best big ones are specialists, not generalists.

Here are three things to think about that may lead you to fire your current marketing firm or advertising agency:

If your agency doesn’t communicate with you, fire them. If you don’t recall the last time you heard from them, how are they supposed to know what your needs are? Even worse, I know of a company today that has an agency on retainer but doesn’t use their services. Their agency never contacts them and doesn’t have a clue about what’s going on with them, but they keep on collecting the fees every month. I think it’s dumb for the company to keep paying the retainer and very bad business for the agency to keep collecting without doing a thing for their client.

If your agency isn’t a learning organization, fire them. The world of marketing is changing too fast these days. If they’re not keeping up then they’re selling you outdated (and less useful) services. Many agencies did something well many years ago and are still trying to sell those same services. A lot of them have come to the cold realization that the old way doesn’t work anymore and are scrambling to figure out what to do next. I can only imagine how confused their clients are.

If your agency hasn’t given you a new idea in the last six months, fire them. This goes along with the learning organization point above but takes it a step further by actually expecting the agency to be leading in some way. It’s not enough to be learning, you have to be applying the new learning as well. If your agency is still making the same recommendations you got from them a year ago, they’re probably not learning and they’re certainly not leading.

The latest episode of The New Mediology is now available in iTunes or you can listen online.

In this episode, Nathan and I discussed the online advertising methods we have seen work since on the last podcast we talked about banner ads as something that doesn’t usually work online. If you listen to the podcast (or have listened to previous podcasts) be sure to leave a message on the comment line at 1-800-881-6059.

I’ve encountered a surge of friends, associates, and acquaintances who are new to blogging. What I’ve found is that in some cases the new bloggers have been blog readers for quite a while and have picked up on a few things about blogging culture, etiquette, technique, and strategy. In other cases, the new bloggers have jumped right in without having spent a lot of time reading blogs (and therefore missing some of the above mentioned things.) I applaud anyone who’s jumping into the blogging waters so this post is for the people who are relatively new to blogging but may have missed a few things along the way…

Here are seven things new bloggers should know:

1. Terminology 101 (part 1): Your blog is a blog so just call it that. It’s not a website or a blog site. It may operate as your web presence (which is what I do and recommend in many cases) but it’s still a blog. It would be incorrect to say, “Check out my blog site.” It would be correct to say, “Check out my blog.” It’s as simple as that.
2. Terminology 101 (part 2): Every entry you add to your blog is a post. Your entries are not blogs. The blog is the entire space but a post is a single entry. Some new bloggers will say, “I just wrote a blog today about…” which isn’t correct. They wrote a post. Not a blog. You can say “post” or “blog post” but not blog. A blog is your web presence (see number 1 above.)
3. Determine your posting frequency: When I was in second grade I signed up for a race with about thirty other second graders. When they shot the gun I took off like a flash. I was a blaze of red-sweat-pant-Member’s-Only- jacket-wearing-glory. The problem was the race was a mile. I was in first place for the first 100 yards. I ended up in dead last. I had no energy for most of the race. I used it all in the first 100 yards. New bloggers can start like that. You have new ideas and are fired up and ready to go…which is great, but if you don’t plan on keeping up that pace for the duration of your blog life, dial it back a little bit to something you can sustain. I recommend you determine your meal to snack ratio. Blogging is not a sprint.
4. Triple the amount of time you spend thinking about your post titles. Most likely you spend only a few seconds on your blog post title but it’s actually one of the most important things you can do. People tend to scan titles and your title may make or break whether someone actually reads the post. This is even more important as people continue to use feed readers in increasing numbers. Your posts are just one trickle in a stream of information and your title is what people will use to determine whether they will read your post or not.
5. Link to people when you mention them. This is one commonly overlooked but easy to fix issue. Good blogging etiquette is to link to a fellow blogger when you mention her/him. If you mention them by name just hyperlink to them. Every blog tool does that. If you see something on someone’s blog and it inspires you to write a post based on what you saw, give that person a “hat tip” if you don’t mention them specifically in the post. If you’ve ever seen something at the end of a blog that looks like this: [HT to Chris] then it’s a reference to a post I saw on Chris’ blog. It’s a hat tip to Chris. Bloggers love links and they love to receive credit when credit it due. They’ll also return the favor in many situations so this can be strategic as well. Link love is a wonderful thing for everyone.
6. Check your moderated comments often. If you moderate your comments try to check them at least daily because commenters want to know that their comments were worth the time they spent to post them. Comments exist to encourage discussion and dialogue but if it takes you forever to approve the comments, you’re not encouraging someone to comment in the future. More than likely they’ll think you rejected the comment and then what was supposed to be a positive experience for the person turns into a negative one because they’ll be sitting there wondering why you didn’t approve their comment. Just approve them often and only reject the stuff that’s spam.
7. The golden rule of blogging is to provide content. Unless your blog is intended to be something personal for yourself, friends, and family this rule applies to you. If you have any hopes of blogging with the intent that people will find it helpful, useful, etc. you need to provide content on a regular basis. Here’s the test: how many of your previous ten posts were about you verses about something that meets the Old McDonald test? Content is about your readers. A personal blog is about you and that’s fine…but if you’re not writing a personal blog, don’t make it about you all the time. The fact of the matter is most people don’t really care about you but they do like it when you give them something entertaining, inspiring, educational, informative, or even outrageous. They may be amused about little things going on in your life from time to time and that’s fine to talk about, but otherwise, give them substance that has value for them.

Last week I found an interview with eBay’s new in-house blogger, Richard Brewer-Hay. This is an good move on their part and one that I think will become increasingly common in the future. There are a few things that were especially interesting in the interview and worth noting for any organization that has official bloggers:

• Bringing in someone from the outside isn’t a bad thing. Brewer-Hay was hired to eBay for blogging. He wasn’t a guy who had been there for a while and moved into that position. An internal person who assumes a full time blogging role isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but someone new will have less bias and likely be a bit more candid than someone who’s been in the organization for many years.
  
  LifeWay Christian Resources, here in Nashville, hired Ed Stetzer a year ago and Ed is an unofficial blogger for LifeWay but had significant credibility before being hired by LifeWay and LifeWay has received the lift it. An outsider can do that for you. The hard question then is this: when does that outsider become and insider? That’s a topic for another day.

• They trust him to say what he’s going to say. This quote really jumped out:

Question: Your blog will be linked from eBay’s PR webpage. How much influence will eBay have on what you write?

Answer: My words go straight up onto the blog, unedited. It’s got to be transparent. There’s got to be an authenticity to it, an honesty to it, otherwise there’s no point in doing it in the first place. I’m going to open up my e-mail to questions from folks. People can comment, too, and comments are going to be open. You’re going to get the good, the bad, and the ugly.

• They’re giving him time to launch. Brewer-Hay has been at eBay since January but the blog isn’t going to launch until April. They’re giving him time to build the blog, familiarize himself with the company, and get his blogging plan in place. It’s also giving them time to get the word out about the upcoming blog…hence the interview.

eBay has realized they need a blogger for all the benefit it provides both in being proactive with news and ongoing relations with the people who are most interested in eBay as well as a quick and immediate outlet for dealing with bad news. In the future most organizations with have numerous bloggers who specialize in particular areas of content but not every organization is yet ready to bring a blogger in. In October I wrote about five types of organizations that shouldn’t blog. This is still applicable for some organizations today but the good news is that they can be overcome with the right people in place.

I had the chance to give three presentations about new media marketing last week so I felt like my brain was constantly on the mantra: content is the new marketing strategy. On Thursday I had just come out of a two hour presentation and went to lunch with a friend at Chappy’s on Church here in Nashville. The food was great and the atmosphere was too. I highly recommend a cup of the seafood gumbo while you’re waiting on your meal if you ever go to Chappy’s.

While sitting there at lunch it struck me that when you create content you’re kind of like a restaurant. Both content creators and restaurants serve something for people that you hope they’re going to like. If we think of creating content more like a restaurant owner thinks about serving really good food (and experiences) to their patrons, we may be helped in making sure we’re providing valuable content and not something that’s half baked or overdone.

If you’re in the restaurant business there are three reactions you hope all your customers are going to have. If you’re in the content business, you want these same three reactions too.

• Savor - When we savor a meal it means we’re enjoying it at that exact moment. We’re taking it in and slowing down to make sure we delight in the full flavorful experience. What if that same feeling could be said about your content? Wouldn’t you love it if people savored the content you provide? If they savor your content you know they found the immediate value of it, and regardless of which of the five content strategies you choose, that is the primary rule of good content.
• Share - Have you ever had a meal at a restaurant that was so good you had to give everyone else a bite so they knew what they were missing? Or maybe you were talking about that restaurant for the entire next week after having eaten there because it was so good. Have you ever found a video so funny that you had to send to a few friends because you knew what they were missing? Same thing isn’t it? When we find something we like we share. Digital content makes sharing a snap and when you create good content one of the best thing you can hope for after the person savors the content him/her self is that they’ll share it. Do you create content that is best positioned to be shared? If you have video on your website that doesn’t provide an embed code, you’re not making it easy for people to share. If you don’t have permanent links for blog posts or articles you’re not making it easy for people to share. If your content doesn’t meet a need that some people (even if only a small group) have, it’s probably not going to be shared…and shared content that’s shared over and over and over again is of course viral marketing.
• Save - Finally, the last reaction you want in the restaurant or content creation business is that the person will save it. If we’re talking about a meal, when they save it for later they’re saying it’s worth taking home to finish later. When they see the immediate value in your content and take the next step to save it, they are indicating that they not only appreciate the immediate value of your content but the potential value it will have for them to reference in the future. One bonus with the save reaction: when your content proves to be worth saving, you have probably earned their attention for another chance for them to savor, share, and save your content in the future.

THEN:

Content was a product.

Content drew people, the people drew advertisers, and the advertisers paid to make more content/product.

Advertisers had to latch onto the content/product because it was the cheapest way to get to the people, and it wasn’t cheap…just cheaper than becoming a content/product itself.

NOW:

Content is still a product.

Content still draws people and still draws advertisers.

Advertisers can now create their own content cheaply. They can broadcast and publish with no need of another content/product as long as they can build their own audience.

CONCLUSION:

• You don’t have to pay $100/month for a small ad in the Yellow Pages.
• You don’t have to pay hundreds of dollars to be in a local coupon booklet.
• You don’t have to pay a thousand dollars for a full page ad in the newspaper.
• You don’t have to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for television commercials.

Still not sure? Check out Rhett & Link. They’re a product. Their content is their product. Their product is their content. General Motors saw their content/product and hired them. Who might buy your product if you start getting into the content business and out of advertising?

An infomercial is supposed to be information in the form of a television commercial. These tend to be hard sells where the goal is clearly to get someone to buy right now (or in the next 30 minutes to receive a bonus pack of whatever they’re selling.) The focus is clearly more on the promotion than the information…meaning the information is only important in conveying the sale.

Contrast that with edutainment which is not overtly commercial in nature, rather it’s teaching something in an entertaining way. I always like Bill Nye the Science Guy for this approach (though I actually grew up with Mr. Wizard and Mr. Rogers.)

And we can’t forget infotainment, which we’re quite accustomed to now. This is a most often a tv show where news is given but dressed up to entertain us simultaneously. I think that was what the whole Dateline NBC, To Catch A Predator thing was supposed to be…maybe.

Given all these portmanteaux (yes, I looked that up) I want to add another one to the mix: the contisement. A content advertisement. The contisment is a commercial or advertisement in the form of content that has value and interest to the target audience. I think Super Bowl ads go for this approach. Clearly they’re trying to entertain (that’s the value) but they’re equally advertising whatever the product or service is.

I go into all of this because even though I think the contisement may be a legitimate category of approaching advertising, it’s still a little different from a pure content promotion strategy. A pure content promotion strategy isn’t overtly commercial. It’s primarily focused on delivering valuable content and only very minimally focused on the promotion. The promotion isn’t any single blog post, podcast, or online video. The promotion is what comes in time after you have earned people’s time, trust, and attention. You don’t stop selling with a content approach. You don’t quit promoting either. You just take the time to build a relationship before you make that sell or give that pitch.

All that being said, if I have to choose a secondary approach after a pure content promotion, I’ll take a contisement any day.

Yesterday I referenced a 2008 iMedia Brand Summit video talking about the blurring lines between ads and content. There were some great stats provided on the video and here were some that really stood out to me.

• 62% of consumers feel “there are too many ads in media.” (source: Yankelovich)
• 65% of consumers feel “constantly bombarded by ads.” (source: Forrester)
• 65% of consumers feel “bombarded by too many ads.” (source: McKinsey & Company)
• 75% of consumers feel “overwhelmed by the amount of media.” (source: NBC)
• 18% of consumers say they dislike all forms of advertising. (source: Doubleclick, January 2007)
• 39% of consumers claim they avoid advertising as much as possible. (source: JWT/Adweek survey, 2007)

Regarding trust in advertisers:

• In 2005, 25% of consumers said they trusted “people in who work in the advertising industry”…which means 75% don’t trust people who work in the ad industry. (source: HarrisInteractive)
• In 2007, 17% of consumers had any confidence in advertisers or the advertising industry…which mean 83% don’t have confidence in ads or advertisers. (source: mediaVillage.com)
• Today, 6% of consumers say they believe marketers’ ad claims…which of course means 94% don’t. (source: Forrester)

Conclusion: Forget the big fish.